The new integrated I & D level organization
Justification:
This recommendation realigns and merges depot and intermediate maintenance activities.
It creates 6 Fleet Readiness Centers (FRCs), with 13 affiliated FRC Sites at satellite locations.
1.
FRC Mid-Atlantic will be located on NAS Oceana, VA
With affiliated FRC Sites
at:
NAS Patuxent River, MD
NAS Norfolk, VA
JRB New Orleans, LA
2.
FRC East is located at Cherry Point, NC
With affiliated FRC
Sites at:
MCAS Beaufort, SC
MCAS New River, NC
HMX-1 at MCB Quantico, VA
3.
FRC Southeast will be located on NAS Jacksonville, FL
With affiliated FRC
Site at:
NAS Mayport, FL
4.
FRC West will be located on NAS Lemoore, CA
With
affiliated FRC
sites at:
NAS JRB Fort Worth, TX
NAS Fallon, NV
5.
FRC Southwest will be located on Naval Station Coronado, CA
With affiliated sites at:
MCAS Miramar, CA
MCAS Pendleton, CA
MCAS Yuma, AZ
NAS Point Mugu, CA
6. Northwest will be located on NAS Whidbey, WA, with no affiliated FRC Sites.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realign Marine Corps Air
Station Cherry Point, NC, as follows:
disestablish Naval Air Depot Cherry Point;
establish Fleet Readiness Center East,
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 265 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Mid Atlantic, Naval Air Station Oceana, VA
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 73 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Mid Atlantic Site Norfolk, Naval Air Station Norfolk, VA
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 38 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Mid Atlantic Site Patuxent River, Naval Air Station Patuxent River, MD
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 12.4 K DLHs to FRC Mid Atlantic Site New Orleans, Naval Air Station JRB New Orleans, LA.
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 63 K DLHs to the Fleet Readiness Center East Site Beaufort, hereby established at Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, SC;
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 111.321 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center East Site New River, hereby established at Marine Corps Air Station New River, Camp Lejeune, NC;
and transfer all remaining depot maintenance workload and capacity to Fleet Readiness Center East, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC.
(From above, 388.4 K Depot Level Hours (DLHs) to other FRCs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realign Naval Air Station
North Island, Naval Base Coronado, CA, as follows:
disestablish Naval Air Depot North Island, COMSEACONWINGPAC (AIMD), and
NADEP North Island Detachment North Island
establish Fleet Readiness Center Southwest, Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base Coronado, CA;
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 28 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Southwest Site Point Mugu, hereby established at Naval Air Station Point Mugu, Naval Base Ventura, CA;
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 118 K DLHs Fleet Readiness Center Southwest Site Miramar, hereby established at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, CA
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 36 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Southwest Site Pendleton, hereby established at Marine Corps Air Station Camp Pendleton, CA
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 26 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Southwest Site Yuma, hereby established at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, AZ
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 26 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center West Site Fort Worth, Fort Worth TX
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 114 K DLHs Fleet Readiness Center Northwest, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, WA
and transfer all remaining intermediate and depot maintenance workload and capacity to Fleet Readiness Center Southwest, Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base Coronado, CA.
(From above, 140 K DLHs to other FRCs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realign Naval Air Station Jacksonville, FL, as follows:
disestablish Naval Air Depot Jacksonville, Naval Air Depot Jacksonville Detachment Jacksonville, and Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department Jacksonville;
establish Fleet Readiness Center Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL;
relocate depot maintenance workload and capacity for 53 K DLHs to Fleet Readiness Center Southeast Site Mayport, hereby established at Naval Air Station, Mayport, FL
transfer all remaining intermediate and depot maintenance workload and capacity to Fleet Readiness Center Southeast, Naval Air Station Jacksonville, FL.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It requires integration and collaboration between Depot level Civil Service personnel and Military Intermediate level Sailors and Marines.
At those FRCs involving Marine Corps MALS (Marine Aviation Logistics Squadrons), because the MALS remain deployable commands, they will affiliate with their FRC organizations, but will remain operationally distinct and severable in all respects.
The FRC D-level functions within the MALS fall under the Commanding Officer of each MALS.
The FRC Commander is the provider of embedded depot personnel, as well as D level technical and logistics support within the MALS.
For all FRCs, there is a combined annual facility sustainment savings of $1.1M; elimination of a total of 529,000 square feet of depot/intermediate maintenance production space and military construction cost avoidances of $0.2M.
This recommendation also includes a military construction cost of $85.7M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economic Impact on Communities:
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 104 jobs (53 direct jobs and 51 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Bakersfield, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 221 jobs (152 direct jobs and 69 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Martin County, IN, economic area, which is 2.6 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 13 jobs (7 direct jobs and 6 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Fallon, NV Micropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 512 jobs (218 direct jobs and 294 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Jacksonville, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 1,190 jobs (632 direct jobs and 558 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the New Bern, NC Micropolitan Statistical Area, which is 1.8 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 12 jobs (7 direct jobs and 5 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Oxnard- Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 1,279 jobs (623 direct jobs and 656 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
Assuming no economic recovery, this recommendation could result in a maximum potential reduction of 68 jobs (44 direct jobs and 24 indirect jobs) over the 2006-2011 period in the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which is less than 0.1 percent of economic area employment.
The aggregate economic impact of all recommended actions on these economic regions of influence was considered and is at Appendix B of Volume I.
 Copyright © 2005 Joe Moore MooreJ |
|
Last Updated: |